.

Lower Elkridge

Does it exist? Does it matter?

Yesterday, a potential  along Route 1 caused some consternation among Elkridgeans. The local cell of the worldwide burger conglomerate hoped to implant a towering Golden Arch over Elkridge soil, as referenced in .

Elkridge Patch user “” responded to the article with a rather scathing description of Route 1 as a road lined by “scumbag motels” and peopled by “bums” and “hookers.” He ended with a screed that seemed to imply that citizens of so-called “Lower Elkridge” get the short end of the Howard County stick.

Although you won’t find Lower Elkridge on a map, this is not the first time that I (a fairly recent arrival) have heard of such a place, nor have I refrained from noting the divide enforced by eight lanes of I-95. They have ; we had . They have a ; we spend summers at . They leisurely consider for swimming pools; we fight intermodal terminals.

The concept of a “Lower Elkridge,” though—the very name reflecting the prideful self-loathing generally associated with underdogs or the American working class—causes me real concern.

It is rare in America to hear someone identify as “rich” or even “upper class.” Asked to describe their social status during a social justice class at Holy Cross (a bastion of upper class America if ever there was one), not a single student identified as anything higher (“higher”) than the rather euphemistic “upper middle class.”

The fact is, if you’re in a household making more than $50,000, you could be defined in purely numeric terms as upper class. (If your family makes more than $109,000, congrats! You’re in the top 10 percent of Americans!)

It is possible that Americans, as a group, are highly sensitive to the perception of self as a function of class, likely because much of our national image is deeply predicated on being classless. (Pun intended, mainly with “Americans abroad” in mind.)

Americans take a vicious sort of pride in not being special, in not being privileged. It is no accident that nearly every U.S. presidential candidate has forged for himself a humble beginning, no matter how many summer yachting adventures or Ivy League degrees lay in his past. T.R. Roosevelt was a Western rancher, not a Harvard scion of one of America’s foremost families. G.W. Bush was a Texas rancher, not a Rangers-owning Yalie.

Yet despite our forefathers' conscious rejection of titles of nobility, American class has become defined, in a capitalist irony perhaps only Marx would find funny, by pure economics. Knights of the paycheck we are. However, Americans' perception of themselves as part of a class is often skewed by our national desire to be perceived as “hard-working,” something that, in the American view, does not fit well with wealth, particularly corporate wealth. (This despite the fact that at some point, that wealth had to be earned, generally through some type of hard work.)

These are the same Americans, of course, who also persist in buying ever larger and more visually stimulating TV sets, delivering ever larger and more visually stimulating McDonald’s commercials into their very homes. Sure, we’ll fight our corporate overlords from cluttering our route home, but we’re more than willing to invite them in.

This, then, is one of the main dichotomies of modern American life. The “American Dream” is ultimately a search for greater wealth, our definition of upward class movement. But identification with that wealth, or with that class, is something to be avoided, even as we snatch after its accoutrements.

Republicans have become, nationally at least, a party dependent on both the votes of the working class and the money of the thin scrim at the very top of the socioeconomic ladder. The base interests of these two parties, especially on economic matters, are often diametrically opposed, leaving the Boehners and McConnells of the world balancing two discordant halves of the American psyche.

I think that is what drives those of us east of 95 to cast verbal stones across the highway. An actual economic split does not need to exist for us to feel it. And yet—I am Lower Elkridgean. If you prick us, do we not bleed? If we are hungry, do we not crave ?

Our sense of community should not be split by a mere highway, and we should not allow our self-perception (or deception) to create a town divided. There are many outside forces working against a solidified Elkridge; we should not be one of them. Our elected officials represent portions of our town, none the whole, dividing their attention with other communities. Major roads run against us, and the sway of our neighbors (Columbia, Ellicott City, and Baltimore and Anne Arundel Counties) seeks to pull us apart.

This divide—real or imagined—may not seem important. What claim does Elkridge itself have on us, or we on it?

The issue at the heart of the McDonald’s sign, though, and at the root of Joe’s fears, is the vitalization of our community. Without a strong and united front, CSX will be in your backyard. Route 1 will be a strip of blight, rather than an artery of life.

No one speaks for Elkridge except for us. If we want change (a , a ) or if we want continuity (), it is up to us to accomplish it, and a self-imposed divide does nothing. Secession is not an option. Upper, Lower, Harwood Park or Rockburn, we are one community with shared concerns. We would do well to remember that.

TJ Mayotte July 18, 2011 at 04:58 PM
I'm with you on the issue of our lack of a definable center- and thanks to the designers and builders of both Rt. 1 and 95, it's unlikely we'll ever have one. However, on whether these issues matter for your daily life, I would have to say yes, these events will affect you. Let's try the intermodal terminal. Say it's built. Property values near the terminal plummet, then those along the now-busier tracks follow suit. The neighborhoods five minutes away from you decline. Your bike rides become possibly less safe, certainly less pleasant. Increased truck traffic make the roads harder to navigate on two wheels. The property value decline continues outward like a wave. Your home is now worth less. Elkridge slips further behind its neighbors, and the negative feedback loop only increases as more families move away. Although the terminal is not in your direct backyard, our community's failure to mobilize and organize successfully has cost everyone. I don't think this is an unlikely scenario. You're right in that only shared issues do not a community make, but they're certainly important. Just as important, if not more so, is shared concern and shared solutions. The problems do nothing to make the community unless they serve as a spur for action.
Geoff Pickett July 18, 2011 at 06:35 PM
Having lived in this area for less than 7 months its a little disappointing to see the intermodal being proposed and the Superfresh closing down. Only time will tell if the intermodal gets placed here or not. But in the case of the Superfresh, the store wasn't that nice but was a great convenience to those that lived on this side of 95. I think it would go a long way in helping the area if they would renovate that entire space and put in a new grocery store. I would think that with all of the housing in existence and being built that it would support a Safeway or a Harris Tweeter or a Wegman's (one can only dream).
Mr. Drew July 21, 2011 at 10:31 PM
I always think of Lower Elkridge as the part of Elkridge between the railroad tracks and the Patapsco River and Deep Run. This is in fact where the the historical town center of Elkridge is - at the intersection of Main St. and Furnace Avenue. And there is bias against Lower Elkridge. It's not the folks on our side of the tracks who keep the pedestrian tunnel under the railroad gated shut.
elkridge mom July 22, 2011 at 06:59 PM
Mr Drew, What do you mean by "It's not the folks on our side of the tracks who keep the pedestrian tunnel under the railroad gated shut." are you implying that people on "the other side of 95" are just as "joe" describes it? Joe: i'll be sure to tell my children you consider them "bums and hookers".
Adam R July 23, 2011 at 06:40 PM
Pick up a copy of the Visitors Guide to Howard County. I could find Elkridge mentioned only two times: The Viaduct and Elkridge Furnace Inn. Everything else is about Columbia and Ellicott City. Elkridge is not even part of any maps in the Visitors Guide. We are a cash cow (property taxes) to the County in terms of revenue, and that is the means to their end for politicians like Watson, and Ulman. These monies will only be spent in Elkridge when absolutely necessary, the bulk will go to Columbia and Ellicott City. Lower Elkridge has no meaning on the type of people living here, unless you make it so. Lower Elkridge pertains to the bottom right corner of the Howard County Map. and our low position of power with the Howard County Government. Now that we are 40,000 Elkridge Citizens strong, we could change this!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »