No Decision on Wegmans Liquor Store

Liquor Board delays decision after main owner, Chris O’Donnell, doesn't show.


The fate of a proposed liquor store to be located inside the new Columbia Wegmans is past the point of being under debate. It's now almost a saga.

After three and half hours of testimony on Thursday evening, and on May 1, the Howard County Alcoholic Beverage Board has again delayed a decision on whether to grant a license to sell alcohol in a space on the second-floor of the Columbia Wegmans.

In May, the decision was delayed to allow members of the public to testify. On Thursday it was because Christopher O’Donnell was not present to testify. O’Donnell is the 90 percent owner of the proposed store and husband of Colleen Wegman, the president of Wegmans.

After discovering that O’Donnell was out of the country, the board decided to postpone a decision until its next meeting, a date for which was not set.

The decision came after lawyers for local liquor store owners pressed the board about the license application, which they said O’Donnell had not signed.

“You have a 90 percent owner for who all we know is a mythical figure,” said Steve Wise, an attorney for King’s Contrivance Liquors and Glenwood Wine and Spirits.

In Maryland, grocery stores owned by chains generally cannot be granted liquor licenses, although there are some exceptions, such as a Giant on the Eastern Shore that has a grandfathered license.

What makes this situation contentious is that the owners of the liquor store, O’Donnell, and Ellicott City resident Mike Smith, who owns 10 percent, are claiming they’re independent of Wegmans, even though the store is to be located on the second floor of the grocery superstore and O'Donnell's wife is the president and part owner of the grocery company.

Local liquor store owners from around the area were at Thursday’s hearing to of grocery stores into the alcohol market.

“If Howard County issues this license it’s opening the gate for all grocery stores to open liquor stores in their county,” said Shirac Patel, who owns Savage Liquors.

Challenges to the liquor store ranged from questions about whether alcohol would be transported through the main Wegmans to whether the application was filled out properly. But perhaps the most significant challenge centered around a zoning issue.

Chris Alleva, a Columbia resident, testified and provided county documents to the board that the land is zoned for a number of uses, including a grocery store, but not a liquor store.

“Zoning regulations are construed strictly,” said Alleva. “If a use is not specified it is not permitted.”

However, Tom Meachum, Smith's attorney, said it’s not under the liquor board’s purview to weigh in on zoning issues.

Tom Beach, an attorney for Perfect Pour, disagreed. “I believe it kills the application. I believe that because of the zoning of the parcel that the liquor board cannot issue a license for retail sale of liquor at this location.”

Also making an appearance at the hearing was the Columbia Wegmans store manager, Wendy Webster. She said she believed the liquor store should be licensed because it’s independent of the grocery store.

“It’s about one-stop shopping for our customers," she added later. "It’s no different than any other wine shop or grocery store next door.”

As for , the 10 percent owner, he came to the stand to testify, but never got the opportunity. He had testified at the first hearing but was brought down from the stand once the board learned O’Donnell was not present.

“We actually feel it’s important to see the 90 percent owner here,” said board member William Neault.

After the hearing, Smith described O’Donnell as a capable venture capitalist who already owns two other successful liquor stores in other states.

“His vision and mine are identical,” said Smith. “I remain confident we’ll be granted a license.

“All of the people I’ve talked to are strongly in favor of a liquor store being adjacent to the Wegmans,” he added. “In fact, I haven’t found anybody who has said it’s a bad idea. Most of them have somewhat cynically expressed the view that the reason the protesters are here is because they’re afraid of competition.”

MG42 June 15, 2012 at 11:45 AM
The laws need to be changed. This shouldn't even be an issue. Already Wegmans is liked much better than the county government, and they're not even open for two more days. Nothing makes more sense and is a more efficient use of retail space than allowing grocery stores to sell liquor. Grant this license immediately!
Cecelia Sawyer June 15, 2012 at 12:38 PM
I agree. The license should be granted; the outdated law should be changed. Move with the Times Howard County !!!!!!!
Cecelia Sawyer June 15, 2012 at 12:39 PM
Please approve the license.
Roux's Pal June 15, 2012 at 02:53 PM
Approve the license - it's time for convenience - and not allow the competitors to spoil it for the entire community! I want to buy wine, if I want it, at the same time I purchase the food - not have to get into my car, drive a few miles to a liquor/wine store - give the consumers convenience. This is ridiculous - issue the license!
Mari June 15, 2012 at 03:49 PM
Keep track of these liquor stores. If you are concerned that they are impediing your convenience and choices, take your business elsewhere. They apparently aren't creative enough to understand that if this application is allowed, they could partner with the other grocery stores to run their own liquor stores as part of a Giant, Safeway, etc. operation since the chains aren't allowed to operate them. Lack of foresight and creativity, if you ask me.
Matt M June 15, 2012 at 03:53 PM
Yes, we need a broad relaxing of the ability to get a liquor license. I understand we're dealing with a controlled substance here, but if someone meets the qualifications...let's do it. Honestly all these liquor store owners sound like they're grasping at straws.
number9dream June 15, 2012 at 04:18 PM
Commercial real estate is doing poorly enough already. How do you propose to fill the spaces vacated by liquor stores run out of business so that you're not "inconvenienced." I'm sure Columbia would be glad to welcome more Dollar Stores.
MG42 June 15, 2012 at 04:24 PM
A complete lack of understanding of competition and economics, all washed down with a swig of fear mongering (Dollar Stores, oh noes!). Another public school success story.
Matt M June 15, 2012 at 05:04 PM
Is it the liquor board's job to worry about commercial real estate? If one more liquor store opens, will that really "run" a lot of them out of business? I know it's kind of unpopular, but if we replace a liquor store with a liquor store...then maybe we didn't need the first one. And maybe we do need a dollar store instead. ;)
Michaelwritescode June 15, 2012 at 05:39 PM
After reading this article I'm left wondering why exactly the board demands to have O’Donnell present? I can theorize a number of possibilities such as potentially having him be on record as stating the independence of Smith and whatnot but I'd prefer to hear the exact explanation quoted from a board member. In practical terms I can't imagine having O’Donnell present will add anything that anyone doesn't already expect him to say. I'd like to have faith in the board's impartiality as they haven't shot down the idea yet but the more delays that pile up the more likely it is to be perceived as filibuster type tactics.
number9dream June 15, 2012 at 07:46 PM
Good points Matt M.
tooraa June 16, 2012 at 01:23 AM
I don't know about liquor but have you *seen a Wegmans wine store? the immense selection. This is what our country is about! I don't live in Columbia but I go there once a month on business and you are lucky .
Ann Delacy June 16, 2012 at 09:53 PM
My concern with the mega store is that it will impact the sales in our smaller village liquor stores and ultimately put them out of business. I know that the store in Owen Brown has been around for decades. Small businesses are owned and operated my local citizens who employee other citizens. Just how many Howard County mom and pop stores and their employees will be affected?
Matt M June 18, 2012 at 03:39 PM
Wegman's is either filling a need or it's not. This liquor store is either going to fill a need or it's not. If there is no need for them, the stores will fail and the (local) jobs added by creating the stores will be lost. Conversely, if the need for grocery stores or liquor stores in village centers are removed by the addition of Wegman's or this new liquor store. Then they will suffer and close and THOSE local jobs will be lost. If there is room for both (and this remains to be seen), then we will have a net gain in local jobs. So why not try it and let the customers decide? That's how things work for all other businesses that don't have some kind of archaic license board process.
Mari June 18, 2012 at 05:35 PM
Isn't the "local citizens/employees" a false argument (and not just here; it's used in many places)? It's not like the employees at Wegman's or any other chain store are from Mars or even other states (unless someone was promoted or transferred from within the corporation and moved here, which will still make them local citisens/employees).
JustABill June 19, 2012 at 07:46 AM
Gee wiz Ann would you feel the same way about this issue if the big bad old mega store was a Giant or Safeway with union employees? My guess is NO, but way to go with the fear mongering. I would assume that the big bad mega store is not busing in their employees from out of state so your red herring use of the mom and pop stores operated by local citizens who employee other citizens is really nothing more than a useless crimson colored smelly fish.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »