Study Shows Climbing Out of Poverty in Howard County Costs Up To $72,000 a Year
The high cost of living in Howard County makes it difficult for "working poor" residents to become self sufficient, a study shows.
A single parent family with two children must earn $72,000 a year in Howard County to escape the label of “the working poor,” according to a report released Wednesday.
The study, commissioned by the Association of Community Services of Howard County (ACS) and conducted by the by the Policy Analysis Center, also shows that a family with two adults and one infant needs $63,537 to be no longer considered among the working poor in Howard County—more than $45,000 above the federal poverty level.
ACS Director Duane St. Clair said this is the first time such a study has been done in Howard County that has measured local self-sufficiency data against income, while comparing that data with federal poverty levels.
The study, entitled "Making Ends Meet in Howard County," was conducted over 1 1/2 years by researchers at The Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies.
The study uses the Center for Women's Welfare's "Self-sufficiency Standard for Maryland" cost of living calculations to determine a new minimum income needed to maintain a decent standard of living in Howard County.
"A lot of times people look at Howard County as being somewhat immune to things like the recession," St. Clair said. "We are looking at what kind of resources can be developed so working poor people in Howard County can live independently."
The report recommended providing for more affordable and accessible child care, as well as offering more education and training opportunities for residents.
According to the report, a single individual in Howard County must earn more than $31,517 to be considered self sufficient and no longer among the working poor.
Advocates for the poor said it takes more to be self-sufficient in Howard County because of the higher cost of living compared with other parts of the state and the country.
Howard County is in the top 10 highest average household income areas in the country, according to census data.
“When you have a population with a high per capita income, that’s going to affect cost of products,” St. Clair said.
In 2009 in Howard County, 29,284 individuals were classified in the report as the working poor, which meant they earned between $10,830 and $31,517 annually.
Sinclair called that number "significant."
"This is not an isolated group of people in the community," he said. "I think it's significant enough in that people in the community should be involved and engaged in finding solutions."
Other findings included:
- Twenty-six percent of the working poor in Howard County have a bachelor’s degree; 10 percent have a graduate or professional degree.
- Thirty-three percent of the working poor in Howard County are employed by the service industry.
- Women make a larger share of the working poor (58.8 percent) than of the entire Howard County population (50.7 percent.)
- Eleven percent of the working poor in the county are not U.S. citizens.
JH
7:56 am on Thursday, September 22, 2011
Interesting look at the topic. Why has the County become a magnet for the poor in recent years? You would think that working poor would look for a location where the cost of liviing is much less, but County welfare programs here are very attractive. That is why our taxes are so high. No easy solutions. However, local charities do a lot to help people.
Camila Fernanda Santos Ozel
9:29 am on Thursday, September 22, 2011
Hi JH, I don't think the county became a "magnet for poor people". Instead, I believe the country is living in a major recession and people are loosing their jobs which causes the numbers of "working poor people" to increase. I do not believe anybody plans to loose their job and move in to Howard County. Also, if you take a look on the numbers, many of those classified as working poor earn a college degree or a graduate degree. This is a moment in America we all should help each other and not put others down.
Ray
11:06 am on Thursday, September 22, 2011
Because Howard County has more resources and more jobs { albeit service jobs} that probably is the major reason people are drawn to Howard County.
What's disturbing is that 26% of the working poor has a bachelor degree and 10% a graduate or professional degree. The two together equals 36% and you would expect a person with a college degree to have better job opportunities. So it's not like they're not trying to help themselves.
I'm more concerned about the section 8 element that drains the county resources.
Anne
12:41 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
With the development of Mass Transit, Howard County became a magnet for the poor of DC & Baltimore. To add to the problem HUD in 1996 decided to conduct an experiment titled the "Move to Opportunity". Residents of 6 inner cities were given vouchers & information on housing in wealthier areas, Columbia among them & families were bused in w/ Sec. 8 vouchers in hand to see what Howard County had to offer. Your tax dollars @ work ladies & gentlemen. And if you would like to see some of the consequences of this foolhardy & arrogant experiment you have only to visit the much-vaunted but overrated Mall in Columbia; it is becoming a ghetto!
Ray
1:24 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
Anne....As a long time Howard county resident I forgot about the " Move to Opportunity" program. You're right.
Dispite the good intentions of the section 8 program - it has been abused by the recipents - not all but too many. Many don't bring anything of value to the community. In my experience and observation they bring the same mindset / behavior / attitude that they had in the city which is nothing but problems. Have you noticed that the crime rate has gone up?
I chose to live in Columbia because of it's diversity, culture , parks and schools. Therefore I was willing to pay the extra price ( read CPRA} for the amenities. Now I can't enjoy the amenities due to the "yo's hanging out at gas station and paths" and just in case anyone thinks that I'm a racist I'm a man of color -aka african american.
bill bissenas
12:22 pm on Tuesday, September 27, 2011
Epic fail by Ulman and Robey. Progressive (socialist) social engineering experiments are almos always doomed to fail.
JH
12:43 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
Good observations. That would mean about 64% have no college educations ( and Social Services will tell you that many have not completed high school). The service sector does employee many of the working poor. So of these folks have moved into these jobs because they lost a higher paying job, but most have been in these jobs even prior to the recession. All high income areas of the country have similar issues.
Charities ( like those in Howard County) are a very good way to help and many generous people here do indeed help.
ABC
2:40 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
This opinion piece was in the WSJ recently and it seems to be relevant to the Section 8 discussions that have been going on recently. Here is an exerpt.
"In the 1990s, the feds were embarrassed by skyrocketing crime rates in public housing—up to 10 times the national average, according to HUD studies and many newspaper reports. The government’s response was to hand out vouchers to residents of the projects (authorized under Section 8 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974), dispersing them to safer and more upscale locales.
Section 8′s budget soared to $19 billion this year from $7 billion in 1994. HUD now picks up the rent for more than two million households nationwide; tenants pay 30% of their income toward rent and utilities while the feds pay the rest. Section 8 recipients receive monthly rental subsidies of up to $2,851 in the Stamford-Norwalk, Conn., area, $2,764 in Honolulu and $2,582 in Columbia, Md.
But the dispersal of public housing residents to quieter neighborhoods has failed to weed out the criminal element that made life miserable for most residents of the projects. “Homicide was simply moved to a new location, not eliminated,” concluded University of Louisville criminologist Geetha Suresh in a 2009 article in Homicide Studies. In Louisville, Memphis, and other cities, violent crime skyrocketed in neighborhoods where Section 8 recipients resettled."
Ray
10:26 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
" But the dispersal of public housing residents to quieter neighborhoods has failed to weed out the criminal element that made life miserable for most residents of the projects. “Homicide was simply moved to a new location, not eliminated,” concluded University of Louisville criminologist Geetha Suresh in a 2009 article in Homicide Studies. In Louisville, Memphis, and other cities, violent crime skyrocketed in neighborhoods where Section 8 recipients resettled.
The above comment tells you that it wasn't the neighborhood that was bad it's certain residents in the neighborhood that are bad. It's a certain mentality that is being carried into new locations.
ABC
8:35 am on Friday, September 23, 2011
Ray, that is absolutely true. Neighborhoods aren't inherently bad or good. What makes a neighborhood bad are the individuals with a criminal mindset. We aren't doing anyone any favors by moving the problem to a new location. Instead of moving poor folks out of the "hood" and in to more affluent neighborhoods, what we should demand is that the powers that be actually clean up these poor inner city neighborhoods. Everyone deserves to live in a clean and safe environment. These programs fail to address the real problem.
Most people in Columbia that throw around the word "ghetto" don't know what the hell they are talking about. I actually did grow up in an NYC ghetto and I can tell you that Columbia is no ghetto. But that doesn't mean that we should sit back and let the criminal element take over. I've worked way too hard and spent way too much on my house to let that happen.
Brook
3:27 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
Exactly, as everyone has said. This article points out the problems of Section 8; if you cannot afford to live without government assistance, then you should not be living somewhere with such a high cost of living.
We need to do what we can to end these programs within our boundaries. We may not legally be able to target Section 8, but we can certainly work with CPRA, HOA, and our Village leaders to bring our regulations down hard on absentee landlords and problem residents.
JH
3:43 pm on Thursday, September 22, 2011
Should we "thank" our elected members of Congress for this crazy mess? Start with our Senators from Maryland and also our member of the House. They are the ones that allow this to happen to Columbia --- perhaps they were even advocates for such a move. The County Executive at the time could have prevented this program. Ask them all to explain why they agreed to this program.
CJ23
2:23 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011
I am proud to live and pay taxes in a community as ethnically and economically diverse as Columbia. By subsidizing housing and services for Maryland's poor without putting them in cages we provide opportunities for disadvantaged children to grow up in a clean, warm environment. Because Columbia is an very integrated community, children grow up seeing with their own eyes that the color of their skin does not predetermine their level of success in life, and that with hard work and good choices they can maximize their chances to live a better life than their parents.
Of course there will be crime when you give people the freedom to choose their own way in life. These are issues we all own, as members of this community. Rejecting groups of people based on their fortunes in life is inhumane, uncivilized, immature, selfish, and frankly speaks of a weak, fearful character.
I am proud to share my community with those less fortunate than me. I am neither afraid of nor disgusted by my fellow Columbians who live on public assistance as most of the commenters on these stories seem to be. I'd rather count the number of children who have the opportunity to walk to school every day in safety and get an education that prepares them for college than spend all day reading the police blotter in terror.
JH
3:58 pm on Friday, September 23, 2011
Parents are the key. Honest hard working mothers and fathers that value education, take responsibility for there own actions, and abide by our laws will help children thrive, be self supporting, and take advantage of all the opportunities that the nation has to offer. They too will see that we need not tolerate criminals and those that enable them. We need not accept unsafe streets and unlawful activity in our community. Stand up for law and order ----- and reject those that suggest in a diverse society we should accept serious crimes and just learn to live with it.
CJ23
1:29 pm on Monday, September 26, 2011
How about we not judge people based on the fact that they have similar skin tones and demographic backgrounds as the handful of individuals who commit the extremely small number of serious crimes in our community? I thought this was America. Perhaps we shouldn't treat a child as a presumed criminal because he or she comes from a broken home, while we are at it.