Soda Ban In Howard County? Public Health Leader Says No
This is a ‘nanny state issue’ - Howard County Health Officer Dr. Peter Beilenson.
Howard County, the healthiest county in the state, according to recent data, is unlikely to follow New York City's lead and pursue a soda ban, the county's top public health official told Patch Thursday.
“I do think this goes too far,” Health Officer Dr. Peter Beilenson said in an interview. “I think it really plays into this nanny state issue--where anything that any public health entity does gets tarred as being a nanny state. In this case, it kind of is.”
New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg's proposal would ban the sale of any cup or bottle of sweetened drink larger than 16 fluid ounces. Diet drinks, dairy drinks, fruit juices and alcoholic beverages would not be affected. Large-size sugared drinks would still be sold in grocery stores.
Even though a soda ban isn’t in Howard County’s future, there are other developments related to public health and soda to look out for, according to Beilenson.
- Howard County health officials are looking at “revising the products sold in vending machines” at Howard County government offices, Beilenson said, declining to give further details.
- Health officials also plan to run a Howard County-led “soda-free pledge” campaign similar to one run last year at Talbott Springs Elementary School, this time over the summer with an area work place, he said.
April Snyder, a teacher’s secretary at Talbott Springs Elementary, said she was among the staff who joined with 90 students in the fourth grade last fall to go without soda for 30 days.
The "Soda-Free 30" pledge with the elementary school was announced Oct. 20, 2011, and Howard County Executive Ken Ulman, Beilenson, and then-Superintendent of Howard County Public School System Dr. Sydney Cousin joined in signing the pledge.
Before Snyder took the soda-free pledge, she said she was drinking about a can of soda per day.
For the first week it was difficult, she said. But then she started to crave water, rather than soda, to quench her thirst.
She gave up soda for the 30 days, but hasn’t touched it since, she said.
“I’m absolutely off soda forever. I would say a lot of staff members are as well. … I don’t buy it at home; my kids are not drinking soda.
“I’ve heard people tell me that I’m worse than a reformed smoker, [I’ll say to them,] ‘Don’t drink that soda, you’re going feel sluggish in an hour.’”
Overall, Beilenson said he supported using “education to drive the free market” in regard to soda, a strategy that he said has been successful in stemming smoking and the consumption of trans fats.
“Sugar-sweetened sodas in particular are a major contributor to the obesity epidemic,” he said. “Forty percent of excess calories in Americans' intake … are attributed to sweetened beverages, the majority of which are sodas.”
Tell us: How much soda do you drink daily? Do you think more should be done to stem soda-drinking in Howard County?
steve
6:52 am on Friday, June 1, 2012
stay out of peoples lives ! you want to ban something ban growth horomones. educate everone that is all you should do, it was my choice to give sodas and my kids followed my choice, lead by example
bill bissenas
9:19 am on Friday, June 1, 2012
Beilenson and Ken "dirty, filthy" Ulman will be back for more of your money and your individual liberty in the name of goodness. These folks and their buddies in Howard County can't wait to solve your problems and save you from yourself.
bill bissenas
9:18 am on Friday, June 1, 2012
Peter Beilenson has never met a nanny-state health issue that he didn't like. Believe me, Beilenson and the other do-gooder socialists in Howard County will be back to impose some sort of sugar restrictions on HoCo residents. Count on it. By the way, Beilenson is the super genius who developed the nanny-state failed Healthy Howard program that has wasted millions of taxpayer dollars. He's also the mensa member who came up with the nanny-state ban on smoking in public parks, noting that designating smoking areas in the parks was not an alternative because it would concentrate second hand smoke for the people using the smoking areas, i.e., the people getting first hand smoke by SMOKING. Yeah, pure brain cells, this guy.
Michaelwritescode
11:52 am on Friday, June 1, 2012
Bill, I respect everyone's right to have an opinion but what you're saying about Beilenson is in obvious contrast and factually inaccurate according to the views he expressed in this article.
bill bissenas
12:55 pm on Friday, June 1, 2012
Watch what Beilenson does, not what he says. He was the leading proponent of the disasterous Healthy Howard and the smoking ban, two profoundly nanny-statist initiatives. His charter is to "do good" for the health of Howard County, and afterall, there isn't anything more good than "saving" us from eating bad things, thus preventing us from becoming obese. Based on the track record of Beilenson and Dirty Ken Ulman, more nanny-statism is coming to HoCo. They are Progs to the core.
H.R. Pufnstuf
2:31 pm on Friday, June 1, 2012
What does Beilenson have to say about Ken Ulman's obesity?
bill bissenas
7:09 am on Sunday, June 3, 2012
This article from the Daily Beast provides the kind of rationale that Beilenson and Dirty Ken Ulman will use to regulate soda and other evil sugary drinks in Howard County: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/06/02/michael-tomasky-mayor-bloomberg-is-right-to-declare-a-war-on-sugar.html