Opposition to Women-only Swim Program Did Not Materialize
PATH members packed Columbia Association meeting to show support of the initiative.
People Acting Together in Howard members packed the Columbia Association's tiny board room Tuesday night to provide a voice of support in a debate that never materialized.
About 55 residents, concerned that opponents of a women-only swim program would ask the board to cancel the program, organized to show their support but it wasn't needed, and the program will continue — at least until January or February.
The initiative is a pilot program. Association staff members will evaluate the program and its attendance after three or four months — it started Oct. 25 — to see if use justifies its existence, a staff member told Patch earlier this month.
News articles about the program over the past week have elicited comments described as nasty, hateful and vitriolic by association staff member Jessie Newburn.
"We've been watching the comments as well, and it's been really tough to see and hear the comments," she said before the meeting began. "Some of the comments have been horrible, horrible — and there's no way of telling if the people are even in Columbia."
The request for the program originated in the local Muslim community by women who cannot enjoy swimming in a co-ed setting because of religious dress codes.
While the idea was initiated by Muslims, it has been embraced by women of many religions and by those who cite personal modesty as a reason they support the separate swim times.
The pool selected for the program was "either a low-use or a no-use pool," Newburn said.
"The time selected is in the middle of the day, and it costs less than $100 a week for the program," she said.
While the board room was packed to overflowing, no one spoke out against the program.
To save time, several designated PATH speakers delivered their comments to the board while the group stood to show the board how widespread support of the initiative is.
Katlin Lamke, 18, told board members she used to enjoy swimming when she was a child but unwanted attention from boys made her stop one of her favorite activities when she was 14.
Thanks to the women-only swim times, which provide a "stress-free" environment, she will once again be able to participate in the activity, she told the board.
Several local clergy members showed up in support of the effort, and the room was filled with people of many races and faiths.
At the conclusion of the meeting, PATH members gathered in the lobby, where lead organizer Cynthia Marshall asked members to participate in a one-word debriefing.
They offered words like "united," "delighted," "empower" and "gratitude."
"We often talk of the world as it is and as it should be," Marshall told the group. "The work we do is trying to make the world as it should be, and we had one of those moments tonight."
MAH 1464
7:51 am on Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Come on people we should do everything we can to accommadate the muslims, they are nothing to fear, they love all of us and go out of their way for our friends that are jewish, just ask them.
Celia
8:31 am on Wednesday, November 23, 2011
I know observant Jewish women who are modest in their clothing and do not swim in mixed company. I hope some of them will be able to make use of this pool time also.
E. Niel Carey
8:58 am on Wednesday, November 23, 2011
CA's action in support of this initiative reinforces the concept of diversity and community that has made Columbia such a great place to live and work.
Niel Carey
Marge Neal
9:33 am on Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Niel — Several speakers last night talked about how proud they are to live in Columbia, and how grateful they are for that diversity and that sense of community that drew them here in the first place.
Ohai
11:04 am on Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Isn't this program the exact opposite of diversity and sense of community? The whole thing with Columbia was inclusion, the janitor living next to the CEO and all of that. A women-only swim program is anti-Columbia.
Amy Lamke
9:40 pm on Wednesday, November 23, 2011
What happened to the sentiment behind the comment you made on the Blog: "Don't See the Need for Women-only Swims" at 12:55pm on Friday, November 18, 2011 when you said:
"Considering Maryland has an obesity rate of about 30%, I think a seperate women's swim time is a great idea. Self select which time is right for you, ladies!"
****************************************************************************************************
Ohai
9:50 pm on Thursday, November 24, 2011
Well, Amy, you have to admit that is a strong argument in favor of women only swim times. You're welcome!
Michael Berla
12:11 pm on Wednesday, November 23, 2011
No, this program is NOT "the exact opposite of diversity". It seeks to include women who, for one reason or another, have felt excluded in the past. Everyone gets to swim in a CA facility--just not at the exact moment they may wish. Is the fact that pools aren't open at 3 a.m. "anti-Columbia"? The fact that nude swimming is discouraged? A men-only program could easily be accommodated as well, if it were requested, without being "anti-Columbia".
Diversity and community demand accommodating as many different people as possible. They don't require that all of them be accommodated in the same program at the same moment.
Kelly Cooper
3:47 pm on Thursday, December 1, 2011
Here is some additional information for those who wish to learn more about CA's women-only swim time pilot program- http://bit.ly/vlTksx.
Thank you,
Kelly Cooper
Columbia Association
Marge Neal
3:52 pm on Thursday, December 1, 2011
Kelly, thanks for posting this information.