New Residential Buildings Proposed for Wilde Lake Village Center
Village officials encourage residents to view the plans and comment at a Monday meeting.
Wilde Lake Village Center’s long-awaited redevelopment moves incrementally forward Dec. 19 when the property’s owner unveils architectural plans for new residential buildings to the village board at a 7 p.m. public meeting at Slayton House.
Giant Food, the center’s anchor supermarket, closed in 2006. Since then, other merchants have shuttered shops and overall business has declined, said Trevor Gardner, manager of Today’s Catch, a seafood store in business for 30 years at Wilde Lake.
“New redevelopment will bring life back into the center,” he said.
Kimco Realty Corporation, which owns the 40-plus-year-old retail hub for Wilde Lake Village, would not return inquiries about redevelopment plans.
However, both Village Board Village Chairman Bill Santos and Village Manager Kristin Shulder confirmed that Kimco representatives would present detailed plans for proposed new housing in a future redeveloped village center.
“They’ll come, the village board will ask questions and then the plans will be displayed in Slayton House for three weeks,” Shulder said. “We encourage residents to view them and comment.”
While all of Columbia’s 10 villages have architectural committees, which enforce village covenants for individual houses’ exterior design and color, only Wilde Lake has guidelines for “non-residential or commercial” development, Shulder explained. She said the additional guidelines were adopted about three years ago because down the road, “we knew there would be changes at the village center.”
To date, Santos said Wilde Lake’s Architectural Committee has approved Kimco’s site plan, or basic footprint, for the proposed residential development. He said Kimco was also working on a petition to the Howard County Department of Planning and Zoning, because the village center is not zoned for residential development.
Kimco’s proposed plans for a revamped Wilde Lake Village Center include two new residential buildings with as many as 250 apartments and parking underneath.
The company is also considering a drug store, a bank and a small food store with offices on the second story. The former Giant store would be torn down to open up one end of the courtyard and to extend one entrance from Twin Rivers Road through the center to Cross Fox Lane.
hmj
3:49 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011
No more apartments --- please! Homeownership is the only way to go in Columbia. Make them condo units or townhomes, but no more apartments.
Laquita Brown
10:12 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011
At least 25% of the units should be set aside for Section 8 tenets. Its important to maintain economic and racial diversity in Colombia. Not everyone can afford to own a home, but that doesn't mean they should be stuck with second rate city schools or have to deal with all the crime in the city.
Andrew Kanicki
8:16 pm on Saturday, December 17, 2011
Laquita, everyone has a right to live in decent, safe housing, in a neighborhood that is within their financial grasp. I'd love to live on the water in Annapolis, but I cant afford it. Consequently, I live in a home and neighborhood that fits my budget.Those on government assistance should try doing the same.
We have our fair share of Section 8 housing here in Columbia, and more is certainly not warranted.
Brook
1:09 pm on Friday, December 16, 2011
Why should Section 8 be put in Columbia? If you're that poor that you require government assistance, then why would you live in an area where the cost of living is 38% higher than the nearest big city? Why not live somewhere where your money goes toward better use?
This concept that the only way to have a good school and less crime is to live in an area beyond your means is nonsense. You can live outside Columbia and still go to good Howard County schools. You can live outside Columbia and still live in decent suburban neighborhoods.
The problem is most people on government assistance have their priorities messed up. They claim they require assistance and need help, but then they turn around and funnel money into luxury items and high-cost areas. I've seen Section 8 families blowing money on Verizon FiOS and gas-guzzling SUVs, all while living in an area where gas is 20 cents more than if they lived not 15 minutes away.
No. We do not need more apartments and we definitely do NOT need Section 8. This has nothing to do with "diversity", it has to do with "practicality". If you need government assistance, then live within your means. And if you need said assistance, Columbia is NOT within your means.
hmj
12:16 pm on Tuesday, December 20, 2011
Very true. Stop adding apartments. Now tell the County Council Chairperson and other elected leaders to stop building apartments in Columbia. She needs to be held accountable.
sheri leach
10:15 am on Tuesday, December 20, 2011
Brook,
I could not have said it better..You hit the nail on the head,,AMEN!!!!